Dedimania forum

nivyo wrote:

I think all of the UIDs you sent can be brought down to luck, I'm a bit unsure about the second one, but it's not very uncommon for people to have crazy sectors on short lol/lucky maps.

Maybe, but especially aEj8YoijmvDaSY1xwt5bERrXfo8 just doesn't allow such a big difference on sector 2 between the average 3.11-3.17s and his 2.95s. To a lesser degree the same seems to apply to wggOuSQA9MOWLUNW_OHeexzFJc8 sector 4: 4.70-4.82s vs 4.57s.

nivyo wrote:

2. Wallbang and speed afterwards.
Here's a gif of a 180 on the block, getting nearly maximum speed. https://gfycat.com/CoolUnhappyBudgie
In order to land without clipping the edge you need about 135 speed. Can you get 135 speed after a wallbang with this line? http://i.imgur.com/L8ildVr.jpg

That was the most suspect part in the replay for me too. Plus it doesn't validate.

Together with the other entries of my previous post, the result is: banned and all deleted, thanks.

lycanthrophy wrote:

players login: dffhbbgappoff   nickname: Somebody

map: o_iW9NHnLWyRZNpMseFXFpclgpe  mini fs hunt 02

Happened yesterday, please re-read the reporting rules, especially 1a. Thanks anyway.

tm2:vrbnjak wrote:

UID:BDOZtiHWyOMzm3fy5cAjjtwlZTi
1st dedi  has an oddly suspicious last sector.

So it seems for #8 as well, but in both cases sector 3 is much slower than average. Neither login appears to be cheating on any other tracks, so on this one they probably use a rare trick.

vin_10 wrote:

can someone check dedi1 on this track 

wGCKlXsZg2uDF1MfM_3naQhb90j
CM-Sleep

Housekeeping performed, thanks.

yoy0 wrote:

OseDBQl_boi1h34E1KT2SSugwH5
atinlay

very old rec, but on the map, no way its possible.

Housekeeping performed, thanks.

hideban wrote:

Yo,can u check this?
http://dedimania.net/tmstats/?do=stat&a … how=RECORD

Housekeeping performed, thanks.

hideban wrote:

Hi, check this.
http://dedimania.net/tmstats/?do=stat&a … how=RECORD

Housekeeping performed, thanks.

yoy0 wrote:

blekitnyogar
pRayKg_vdFY1YUU4iYIsCm1p8jh

And a few more entries. Banned and all deleted, thanks.

romnickol wrote:

Hello! Check this:
UID: XwK5uksmKKN4X7x0Xl0vmjGg3Jl
User     xr6toque_

You forgot to read the reporting rules, especially 1a.

nivyo wrote:

Less than 3 months after getting banned

That doesn't mean anything: some banned cheaters return the same day, others after multiple years.

nivyo wrote:

on the account rundalis-2, he's back in town cheating again.
This time under the Login: strawbear2

Other than the nick being similar (but not identical), why would this be the same player? Nicknames being changeable, they aren't strong evidence of that anyway.

nivyo wrote:

UID: _BsVNGipVSgjFwFAYYZQ6btqtk1

He beat the previous WR twice by quite a hefty margin, both runs didn't validate.
Screenshots:
http://i.imgur.com/s3p3rn4.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/SvbMCGq.jpg

I made a video of all the evidence I could collect specating him driving (His 1:19.77 replay is shown at 5:30, though I think the most revealing evidence is in the beginning of the video):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sHl_PFGDd9g

Interesting. But is that the only track this happened on? As you now, only repeat offenders get banned.

nivyo wrote:

Isn't hacking twice on the same track a repeat offense?

Nope, unless it happens on two different days, both times with convincing evidence.

nivyo wrote:

There's one other record that I think could be hacked, but I have no evidence of that. It is a very "loose" track, and not very hunted yet. Hard to make a conclusion on. PwBfur5DWR7ZXIR98e3_jeIY0T6

Then it doesn't count.

nivyo wrote:

I do think that the evidence I have already provided should be enough for a ban.

No, just enough for housekeeping and a warning in the next update. Thanks.

fish___chips wrote:

UID: Qcr98pBqwgT6GmvsdotnRlOdQCm
Login: wellingtonmonte

Just an obvious cheated topdedi.

Many more than just that one. Banned and all deleted, thanks.

tm2:vrbnjak wrote:

UID: Cja4xMmiiQ8FXRvW6DSdC5x5TK3
Login: ozgur1

Impossible sectors

And a whole bunch more. Banned and all deleted, thanks.