Dedimania forum

nia-nia_nia-nia-nia wrote:

this record:

45674535    TMU    jurk87    00:12.71    TAttack    2 HARD 4 NOOBS    kaioprotos    XASECO-1.14    2012-03-04 11:10:07    12710

currently #15 in this list:
http://dedimania.net/tmstats/?do=stat&a … how=RECORD

Right, and a bunch more throughout the past two weeks. Banned and all deleted, thanks.

trackmanieur wrote:

http://tmnforever.tm-exchange.com/main.aspx?action=trackshow&id=1958177

dedi 1&2 cheat

A TMX link requires me to go there, download the track or a replay, extract its UID, and then use that on the tmstats site. In future reports, please provide the tmstats link directly. Thanks.

Anyway, housekeeping performed.

tk_v2 wrote:

http://dedimania.net/tmstats/?do=stat&Uid=dSMWR8DFJEIOa7zZWTwkDQr2Xad&Show=RECORDS
TA, dedi 1
sorry, but im not really sure if this is cheated or not, the guy is a really good player, but still. cp1 and 2 seem ok, but from 3 on its just godspeed, not an expert, so idk
login: indy_air

Read this: http://tmnforever.tm-exchange.com/main. … =auto#auto
Speedbugs, yeah, happens with very bad connection, usually you get Invalid time message but he didnt (standing to his words). In any case, that rec is not 100%legit

tk_v2 wrote:

http://dedimania.net/tmstats/?do=stat&Uid=mk0BLhzDvoeEE1tC7TKj8uvcAK4&Show=RECORDS
heres another similar rec from someone else
TA, dedi 26
another insane cp1 time, no other dedi has come close
login: luke_filewalker

Well it's 'only' 0.08 faster than ankmach's first cp, let Xymph do his good scans ^^ (I checked a few records made around that day and none was really suspect)

Cheeerss

enryx13 wrote:

tk_v2 wrote:

http://dedimania.net/tmstats/?do=stat&Uid=dSMWR8DFJEIOa7zZWTwkDQr2Xad&Show=RECORDS
TA, dedi 1
sorry, but im not really sure if this is cheated or not, the guy is a really good player, but still. cp1 and 2 seem ok, but from 3 on its just godspeed, not an expert, so idk
login: indy_air

Read this: http://tmnforever.tm-exchange.com/main. … =auto#auto
Speedbugs, yeah, happens with very bad connection, usually you get Invalid time message but he didnt (standing to his words). In any case, that rec is not 100%legit

Thanks for digging up that link, record deleted with no further consequences.

enryx13 wrote:

tk_v2 wrote:

http://dedimania.net/tmstats/?do=stat&Uid=mk0BLhzDvoeEE1tC7TKj8uvcAK4&Show=RECORDS
heres another similar rec from someone else
TA, dedi 26
another insane cp1 time, no other dedi has come close
login: luke_filewalker

Well it's 'only' 0.08 faster than ankmach's first cp, let Xymph do his good scans ^^ (I checked a few records made around that day and none was really suspect)

This login made one clearly cheated entry on Green MetaL on 2012/01/12, plus a number of subtly weird/impossible entries (including the above one) in the following weeks. It took way too much time to verify it all, but in the end I decided on a ban and deleted all his recs. Plus the investigation turned up another subtle cheater as a side-effect. :) Thanks for the report.

IZkr2y_eSXuLJi2QRyDMjBMZ9F5 track tmx dedi

TA 6.90 by mike_und_lukas

He seems to be the author of the track. But you can barely make it to the ramp in that time, let alone finish.

http://www.dedimania.com/tmstats/?do=st … ow=RECORDS

cheater top1

Login: binford_6100_

Maps: R6E0IMW8R3mdctGsjuH2gLM7eqk,
          7VviwfWHyXRM1RNQbKwTlbadpq4
this times impossible

Login: nem.arn

Maps:
JHMnmLi9UZ9QRZuIik5J0ODqNfh

Impossible Time(s)

Hi,

login: paterpaul1
ID : I0jKgM_wWDlzGRwio6cW0Avp7Dk   first CP not possible
ID : Fkudrs3ZoIHvtQDO2cK4rFxzeol
ID : qEVB9SIblMCSixiGvsmCmUTgopi    2. Cp very suspekt
ID : ykKZAuMinb_ThTS3AuFL_ux1A5k 
ID : jlJdxat9i9bYAjfLWKOvgCQwzwl
ID : GZCo_d4BBk1phZ5YEYh1EyfKoM4
ID : wFynIyRsqpBxwAqg2L6vD0Mt7Fd   2. and 3. cp time??? and than this end time ???
ID : Wl9wjU4EMkPrVFeHAoKARoH1lx7
ID : EKpSPG5Nyqs0F4YODh_QPokIerc   first dedi and his dedi(4.) check cp time

i think all times cheat

Hi again^^

found this suspect rec : Login: dropsi

ID: nk_8sZejOkghSJi0U1G8Nr_VQJ7

I cant see a replay what do you think ?

hi
I do not know what the problem is. You quench times from 0:01 to 0:03 riders who are faster. I'm not the best driver but other drivers when writing purely to their contribution to their recorde were 0:01 to 0:03 outbid these times deleted or they come on the black list. I have been following the posts for some time. not take it personally. But where is the justice? when the other driver this time you delete  this time. is this fair play? ok, when he has a replay, than is ok;)

xymph wrote:

bloodsures453 wrote:

found this suspect rec : Login: dropsi

ID: nk_8sZejOkghSJi0U1G8Nr_VQJ7

I cant see a replay what do you think ?

I think dropsi got very lucky there, but generally he's also known as a very good player. It would indeed be helpful if he'd upload the replay though, as he's done with other "lucky" recs.

Hey there i asked him but as i expected he cant find it anymore. he did this record almost a year ago. He got a new pc since a few month and didnt save his replays so its gone. hes said hes gonna try it again but he also said that was a pretty lucky landing at the beginning so we will see .


greetz

Boerta

Hey,
found a track, where Top 13 is wrong.
Maybe an Aseco-Bug
Ubu02mols8m9j5BbHIOeL4o6qdh
There is no way to get 6 seconds on this track and the 13 records are all from same date.
Or what do you think?
sick ;-)

Last edited by sick_castrator (2012-04-18 22:25:35)